Monday 31 October 2011
Captain's Log : Final Entry
Firstly, a bit about the thematic underpinnings of my final animation, entitled Beacon.
Beacon is a counterpoint to my previous project, Jumbleton, and is also a resolution. Where Jumbleton was about a chaotic mind and the resulting distorted perspective, Beacon is about arriving at a place of order, tranquility and understanding. I say arriving, because the ghostly and form-adaptive ship that steadily pilots its way toward the light is representing the concious thought of the person who's mind this is, and it has been a long journey through chaos (with a two night stop-over at Jumbleton to take on supplies). The beacon itself is the point of realisation, epiphany or truth that allows for the serenity that follows.
I have chosen the likeness of a ship rather than something more 'creaturely' because it speaks of long journeys and adventures, and also because I think the ship-lighthouse relationship is quickly readable without as much explanation. It's ghostly and adaptive nature is a clue that this symbol embodies thought and life, and is far from being a literal ship. Again, this being the realm of the mind, things are familiar yet distinctly strange, like dreams.
The environment is an adaptation of Jumbleton, using its furniture pieces to create an orderly space instead. The chairs being randomly placed on top of the table or underneath it helps to break it up a bit and look more natural and interesting, while also adding a metaphorical quiet to the scene. Chairs being put away on tables like that says to me that everyone is gone for the day, it is deserted and silent here. I have tried to strike a balance to maintain the ethereal strangeness without letting it become creepy, which would go against the intended mood.
Secondly, credit for the music track goes to Anzeigen, whose wonderful ambient works I found on Soundcloud. The track used is Eternals.
Lastly, a big hearty thanks to JP, Richard and Elle for making this paper as fun, engaging and challenging as they could. Putting aside the stuffy academic trappings of university teaching in favour of a more personal approach takes guts, and the class surely benefited. I hope to collaborate with you all in the future, if fate allows.
Luke
Sunday 30 October 2011
Ship Behaviour
I finally worked out all the bugs in the ship behaviour, so it looks shippy now :D
The basic idea is to make it tack towards the beacon (the lamp) rather than approach it directly, and once there, circle the beacon continuously. The algorithm is as follows:
This algorithm doesn't require any state changes to do these two behaviours (although could probably be more tightly controlled by having states), it just needs to be tuned so both circling and tacking look reasonably close to what I want.
I had to deal with handedness (the exercises we did set me up well for that though) and a problem of comparing two angles to see which one is 'bigger', when the angles wrap around from 359 to 0 and throws everything off. After many ideas for solutions, and some input from JP, I figured out that my case was a little simpler since I didn't need to find the angle, just know which direction to steer the ship in. So I just tested if the difference between the two angles I had found was > 180, and if it was, it meant I should reverse the sign, because going the other way around the circle was going to be faster, thus the best way to turn to start making these two angles line up. I'm sure that was really hard to follow, but it took a while to figure out so I wanted to write about it! Diagrams would help, but the sketches in my book are probably even more like gibberish than this paragraph.
The basic idea is to make it tack towards the beacon (the lamp) rather than approach it directly, and once there, circle the beacon continuously. The algorithm is as follows:
- Move ahead
- Influence your turning speed right or left, whichever way points you at the beacon
- Turn by the amount of your turning speed
Because there is a maximum turning speed, and the amount that it can be influenced each frame is small, this gives the ship very 'heavy' steering. It causes swinging behaviour because the ship effectively has turning inertia, once it is turning in one direction it takes quite a few frames for it to be able to turn back the other way, by which point it is well off the target again.
It will also cause the ship to orbit the beacon, as long as it has a reasonable approach (i.e. not flying straight into the beacon). If the beacon is always to the left, and the max turning speed never allows the ship to turn left far enough to point at the beacon, it will keep trying to and therefore orbit. This motion is intended to say, 'I've arrived', but in a shippy sort of language, where you can't stop moving and you can't just run straight into the target.
This algorithm doesn't require any state changes to do these two behaviours (although could probably be more tightly controlled by having states), it just needs to be tuned so both circling and tacking look reasonably close to what I want.
I had to deal with handedness (the exercises we did set me up well for that though) and a problem of comparing two angles to see which one is 'bigger', when the angles wrap around from 359 to 0 and throws everything off. After many ideas for solutions, and some input from JP, I figured out that my case was a little simpler since I didn't need to find the angle, just know which direction to steer the ship in. So I just tested if the difference between the two angles I had found was > 180, and if it was, it meant I should reverse the sign, because going the other way around the circle was going to be faster, thus the best way to turn to start making these two angles line up. I'm sure that was really hard to follow, but it took a while to figure out so I wanted to write about it! Diagrams would help, but the sketches in my book are probably even more like gibberish than this paragraph.
Saturday 29 October 2011
The Ship Skeleton
Here's what the ship looks like without its particles on yet. Actually you will never see this in the final, it will be invisible.
Environment
I'm revising the environment to be both better suited to an animation and to reduce render times. Since I have the chance, I wanted to make a sort of counterpoint to the previous project's wild jumble, and make a sort of calm orderly place with perhaps a blue tint. The owner of this ship of thoughts is finding his way out of the storm, and being led into a place of clarity and tranquility. A hard-earned wisdom.
The whole look is still fairly eerie and ethereal because this is not a place where physical beings walk. It is a place for metaphor and memory, for fiction and philosophy, intangible things.
I can't go back to depth-mapped shadows now, raytracing is just better. And with a really high res depth-map, it's way slower than raytracing anyway on this scene. That last 640x480 render was only 4 seconds, so I should get away with it once my particles are in. It's only a few hundred spheres :D. Also, quadratic decay rate on the point light coupled with sparing use of ambient light to help out the farther corners seems to be a pleasing combo.
The whole look is still fairly eerie and ethereal because this is not a place where physical beings walk. It is a place for metaphor and memory, for fiction and philosophy, intangible things.
I can't go back to depth-mapped shadows now, raytracing is just better. And with a really high res depth-map, it's way slower than raytracing anyway on this scene. That last 640x480 render was only 4 seconds, so I should get away with it once my particles are in. It's only a few hundred spheres :D. Also, quadratic decay rate on the point light coupled with sparing use of ambient light to help out the farther corners seems to be a pleasing combo.
Particle Test
I've managed to get the particles to follow a goal object, so making an object out of blocks and setting each block as a target for a group of particles has the effect of making a morphing object made of particles. Once the base object is hidden, the illusion is complete. The particles can be told to collide with other objects, so adding the relevant scenery to this list of collidable things makes an object that morphs around the scenery.
There are some problems with this system, notably that the particles get stuck if their goal objects fly perfectly straight through a perpendicular surface, but this should only happen in my test so hopefully particles won't be left behind once their goal is interestingly animated.
There are some problems with this system, notably that the particles get stuck if their goal objects fly perfectly straight through a perpendicular surface, but this should only happen in my test so hopefully particles won't be left behind once their goal is interestingly animated.
Project 3: Behaviour Concepts
My three concepts were all about floaty particle weirdness, because I had a concept in mind related to particles and was trying to find the best way to realise it and give it a thematic home. In the end, I chose concept 1 - Ship - because I feel like it's the purest form of this original feeling.
Elle commented that concept 1 was interesting aesthetically but lacked any real interaction with the environment, so after thinking some more about it, the plan is to make the ship interact with a lamp or lamps, like they are somehow beacons or lighthouses. The ships are supposed to be representative of a journey over time, a pilgrimage of thoughts and perhaps moods, so having light to show them the way fits in very nicely.
Elle commented that concept 1 was interesting aesthetically but lacked any real interaction with the environment, so after thinking some more about it, the plan is to make the ship interact with a lamp or lamps, like they are somehow beacons or lighthouses. The ships are supposed to be representative of a journey over time, a pilgrimage of thoughts and perhaps moods, so having light to show them the way fits in very nicely.
Saturday 1 October 2011
Final Renders
The full story behind Jumbleton is written up in the documentation I handed in, but the mood is pretty apparent just from looking at these shots.
More Development Renders
Putting the lamp and the table in with the chairs made things look a bit more interesting, and it finally looked how I had imagined it once tweaking the numbers. I decided at that point to focus on rendering and presentation from then on, rather than any more coding or modelling, just because I knew how long it would take and what an important part of the process it is.
These pics show the development of the darker take on the original concept, with the furniture swirl not being something playful but rather something looming and imposing. The scale, colours, lighting and shadows all began to reinforce this theme as I refined the environment further.
Turning up the lights too bright did kinda ruin the effect.
This render uses one white overhead light, in the centre of the furniture swirl, because at the time there were over 100 lamps in the scene and I thought all that lighting would slow things down. I got this wonderful spiral shadow effect on the chair and spent some time recreating it later for one of my final renders.
Proper illumination and glow on the lampshades themselves (rather than just the bulb objects) paid off so much.
The shadows! They speak to me.
DOF fail:
Two renders from when I was setting up the base scene:
These pics show the development of the darker take on the original concept, with the furniture swirl not being something playful but rather something looming and imposing. The scale, colours, lighting and shadows all began to reinforce this theme as I refined the environment further.
Turning up the lights too bright did kinda ruin the effect.
This render uses one white overhead light, in the centre of the furniture swirl, because at the time there were over 100 lamps in the scene and I thought all that lighting would slow things down. I got this wonderful spiral shadow effect on the chair and spent some time recreating it later for one of my final renders.
Proper illumination and glow on the lampshades themselves (rather than just the bulb objects) paid off so much.
The shadows! They speak to me.
DOF fail:
Two renders from when I was setting up the base scene:
Wednesday 21 September 2011
House and Contents
So here are the latest things to be added to the pile, a lamp and a little side table. I still have to figure out how to import objects from external files, since I've not been working like that so far and I think it would be useful.
Monday 19 September 2011
Organising chaos
I've been playing with scale some more, and although my original ideas called for an approach that suggests some kind of gravity in the environment, I really like the floating trail of chairs, shrinking down to sit on the original chair.
I had an idea for arranging the chairs based on their angle too, and wanted to try it out. I'm not yet sure whether it's better than the chaotic mess it is otherwise. There's something more ... monolithic and intelligent about it now. It's much more sinister, especially with the chair legs facing out.
I then added some relative randomness, to rough it up a bit. The cold and orderly version has a different feel to the roughed up version, I think roughed up is more in line with my aims.
So the big question is: legs in or out?
Elle has suggested, and I think she might be right, that I start polishing the aesthetics now and leave the minor tweakings for last. This makes a lot of sense, seeing as the whole look of the thing will be altered by adding in extra geometry. It is time for lamp, side table, and some other furniture.
I had an idea for arranging the chairs based on their angle too, and wanted to try it out. I'm not yet sure whether it's better than the chaotic mess it is otherwise. There's something more ... monolithic and intelligent about it now. It's much more sinister, especially with the chair legs facing out.
I then added some relative randomness, to rough it up a bit. The cold and orderly version has a different feel to the roughed up version, I think roughed up is more in line with my aims.
So the big question is: legs in or out?
Elle has suggested, and I think she might be right, that I start polishing the aesthetics now and leave the minor tweakings for last. This makes a lot of sense, seeing as the whole look of the thing will be altered by adding in extra geometry. It is time for lamp, side table, and some other furniture.
Subscribe to:
Posts (Atom)